Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorKouiti, Malak
dc.contributor.authorCastillo-Hermoso, María Ángeles
dc.contributor.authorYoulyouz-Marfak, Ibtissam
dc.contributor.authorSaeed Khan, Khalid 
dc.contributor.authorThangaratinam, Shakila
dc.contributor.authorOlmedo-Requena, Rocío
dc.contributor.authorZamora, Javier
dc.contributor.authorJiménez-Moléon, José Juan 
dc.date.accessioned2023-12-05T09:26:08Z
dc.date.available2023-12-05T09:26:08Z
dc.date.issued2023-12-04
dc.identifier.citationKouiti M, Castillo-Hermoso MÁ, Youlyouz-Marfak I, Khan KS, Thangaratinam S, Olmedo-Requena R, et al. Persistent organic pollutant exposure as a risk factor of gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2023;00:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17725es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10481/86032
dc.description.abstractBackground: Findings related to the association between persistent organic pollut- ants (POPs) and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) are inconclusive. Objectives: To estimate the strength of the association between POP exposure and GDM in a systematic review with meta-analysis. Search strategy: MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science were searched until July 2023. Selection criteria: Cohort and case–control studies analysing the association be- tween POPs and GDM. Data collection and analysis: We assessed the risk of bias using the Quality in Prognosis Studies scale (QUIPS). Standardised mean differences were pooled using random-effect models. Main results: Sixteen articles including 12 216 participants were selected. The risk of bias was high in four articles (25%), moderate in 11 (68.75%) and low in one (6.25%). Small mean difference between GDM cases and controls was observed for PFHpA (0.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.1–0.35, I2 = 0.0%), PCB180 (0.37, 95% CI 0.19–0.56; I2 = 25.3%), BDE47 (0.23, 95% CI 0.0–0.45, I2 = 0%), BDE99 (0.36, 95% CI 0.14–0.59; I2 = 0%), BDE100 (0.42, 95% CI 0.19–0.64; I2 = 0%) and HCB (0.22, 95% CI 0.01–0.42, I2 = 39.6%). No considerable difference was observed for the rest of POPs. Conclusion: Small mean differences between GDM cases and controls were ob- served for some POPs. However, evidence shows mostly moderate quality and results were heterogeneous. Improved research methodology is needed to assess POPs and GDM risk.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipFunding for open access charge: Universidad de Granada/CBUAes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherWileyes_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectExposurees_ES
dc.subjectGestational diabetes mellituses_ES
dc.subjectMeta-analysises_ES
dc.subjectPersistent organic pollutantses_ES
dc.subjectRisk factores_ES
dc.subjectSystematic reviewes_ES
dc.titlePersistent organic pollutant exposure as a risk factor of gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysises_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/1471-0528.17725
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional