Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorLópez-Campos, José Luis
dc.contributor.authorAbad Arranz, María
dc.contributor.authorCalero Acuña, Carmen
dc.contributor.authorRomero Valero, Fernando
dc.contributor.authorAyerbe García, Ruth
dc.contributor.authorHidalgo Molina, Antonio
dc.contributor.authorAguilar Pérez-Grovas, Ricardo Ismael
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Gil, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorCasas-Maldonado, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorCaballero Ballesteros, Laura
dc.contributor.authorSánchez Palop, María
dc.contributor.authorPérez-Tejero, Dolores
dc.contributor.authorSegado, Alejandro
dc.contributor.authorCalvo Bonachera, José
dc.contributor.authorHernández Sierra, Bárbara
dc.contributor.authorDoménech, Adolfo
dc.contributor.authorArroyo Varela, Macarena
dc.contributor.authorGonzález Vargas, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorCruz Rueda, Juan José
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-12T10:14:58Z
dc.date.available2016-01-12T10:14:58Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationLópez-Campos, J.L.; et al. Clinical Audits in Outpatient Clinics for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Methodological Considerations and Workflow. Plos One, 10(11): e0141856 (2015). [http://hdl.handle.net/10481/39436]es_ES
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10481/39436
dc.description.abstractObjectives: Previous clinical audits for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have provided valuable information on the clinical care delivered to patients admitted to medical wards because of COPD exacerbations. However, clinical audits of COPD in an outpatient setting are scarce and no methodological guidelines are currently available. Based on our previous experience, herein we describe a clinical audit for COPD patients in specialized outpatient clinics with the overall goal of establishing a potential methodological workflow.es_ES
dc.description.abstractMethods: A pilot clinical audit of COPD patients referred to respiratory outpatient clinics in the region of Andalusia, Spain (over 8 million inhabitants), was performed. The audit took place between October 2013 and September 2014, and 10 centers (20% of all public hospitals) were invited to participate. Cases with an established diagnosis of COPD based on risk factors, clinical symptoms, and a post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC ratio of less than 0.70 were deemed eligible. The usefulness of formally scheduled regular follow-up visits was assessed. Two different databases (resources and clinical database) were constructed. Assessments were planned over a year divided by 4 three-month periods, with the goal of determining seasonal-related changes. Exacerbations and survival served as the main endpoints.es_ES
dc.description.abstractConclusions: This paper describes a methodological framework for conducting a clinical audit of COPD patients in an outpatient setting. Results from such audits can guide health information systems development and implementation in real-world settings.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis study was financially supported by an unrestricted grant from Laboratorios Menarini, SA (Barcelona, Spain).es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science (PLOS)es_ES
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Licensees_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es_ES
dc.subjectChronic obstructive pulmonary diseasees_ES
dc.subjectBronchodilatorses_ES
dc.subjectDrugtherapyes_ES
dc.subjectOutpatientses_ES
dc.subjectHospitals es_ES
dc.subjectOutpatient clinicses_ES
dc.subjectPatientses_ES
dc.subjectDatabases es_ES
dc.titleClinical Audits in Outpatient Clinics for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Methodological Considerations and Workflowes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0141856


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License