<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/" xmlns:ow="http://www.ontoweb.org/ontology/1#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:ds="http://dspace.org/ds/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf.xsd">
   <ow:Publication rdf:about="oai:digibug.ugr.es:10481/76884">
      <dc:title>Resource use during systematic review production varies widely: a scoping review</dc:title>
      <dc:creator>Nussbaumer Streit, B.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Martínez, P.</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>EVBRES COST Action</dc:creator>
      <dc:subject>Evidence synthesis</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Time</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Personnel</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Costs</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Resources</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Efficient</dc:subject>
      <dc:description>Objective: We aimed to map the resource use during systematic review (SR) production and reasons why steps of the SR production&#xd;
are resource intensive to discover where the largest gain in improving efficiency might be possible.&#xd;
Study design and setting: We conducted a scoping review. An information specialist searched multiple databases (e.g., Ovid&#xd;
MEDLINE, Scopus) and implemented citation-based and grey literature searching. We employed dual and independent screenings of&#xd;
records at the title/abstract and full-text levels and data extraction.&#xd;
Results: We included 34 studies. Thirty-two reported on the resource use—mostly time; four described reasons why steps of&#xd;
the review process are resource intensive. Study selection, data extraction, and critical appraisal seem to be very resource intensive, while protocol development, literature search, or study retrieval take less time. Project management and administration required a large&#xd;
proportion of SR production time. Lack of experience, domain knowledge, use of collaborative and SR-tailored software, and good&#xd;
communication and management can be reasons why SR steps are resource intensive.&#xd;
Conclusion: Resource use during SR production varies widely. Areas with the largest resource use are administration and project&#xd;
management, study selection, data extraction, and critical appraisal of studies.</dc:description>
      <dc:date>2022-09-23T07:07:53Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2022-09-23T07:07:53Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2021-06-04</dc:date>
      <dc:type>info:eu-repo/semantics/article</dc:type>
      <dc:identifier>B. Nussbaumer-Streit... [et al.]. Resource use during systematic review production varies widely: a scoping review, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Volume 139, 2021, Pages 287-296, ISSN 0895-4356, [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.05.019]</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>https://hdl.handle.net/10481/76884</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.05.019</dc:identifier>
      <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
      <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</dc:rights>
      <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
      <dc:rights>Atribución 4.0 Internacional</dc:rights>
      <dc:publisher>Elsevier</dc:publisher>
   </ow:Publication>
</rdf:RDF>