<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/" xmlns:ow="http://www.ontoweb.org/ontology/1#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:ds="http://dspace.org/ds/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf.xsd">
   <ow:Publication rdf:about="oai:digibug.ugr.es:10481/23451">
      <dc:title>Complementary Material to the study "Reviewers' ratings and bibliometric indicators: hand in hand when assessing over research proposals?</dc:title>
      <dc:creator>Cabezas-Clavijo, Álvaro</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Robinson García, Nicolás</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Escabias-Machuca, Manuel</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Jiménez Contreras, Evaristo</dc:creator>
      <dc:subject>Dataset</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Bibliometric indicators</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Peer review</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Spain</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Grant proposals</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Research funding</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Research policy</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Evaluation agencies</dc:subject>
      <dc:description>Complementary material of a study which analyzes the influence of bibliometric indicators.</dc:description>
      <dc:date>2013-02-04T12:30:13Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2013-02-04T12:30:13Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2013-02-04</dc:date>
      <dc:type>dataset</dc:type>
      <dc:identifier>http://hdl.handle.net/10481/23451</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>10.30827/Digibug.23451</dc:identifier>
      <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
      <dc:rights>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/</dc:rights>
      <dc:rights>info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</dc:rights>
      <dc:rights>Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License</dc:rights>
      <dc:publisher>Universidad de Granada</dc:publisher>
   </ow:Publication>
</rdf:RDF>