Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorFu, Ziguo
dc.contributor.authorWu, Xingli
dc.contributor.authorLiao, Huchang
dc.contributor.authorHerrera Triguero, Francisco 
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-09T10:37:32Z
dc.date.available2019-10-09T10:37:32Z
dc.date.issued2018-10-30
dc.identifier.citationFu, Z., Wu, X., Liao, H., & Herrera, F. (2018). Underground mining method selection with the hesitant fuzzy linguistic gained and lost dominance score method. IEEE Access, 6, 66442-66458.es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10481/57266
dc.description.abstractUnderground mining method selection is a critical decision problem for available underground ore deposits in exploitation design. As many comprehensive factors, such as physical parameters, economic benefits, and environmental effects, are claimed to be established and a group of experts are involved in the issue, the underground mining method selection is deemed as a multiple experts multiple criteria decision making problem. Classical mining method assessment exists some gaps due to the way of representing opinions. To address this matter, a hesitant fuzzy linguistic gained and lost dominance score method is investigated in this paper. To enhance the flexibility and gain more information, mining planning engineers are allowed to convey their knowledge using hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets in the underground mining method selection process. A novel score function of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set is introduced to compare any hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets. Then, based on the score function, a weight determining function is proposed to calculate the weights of criteria, which can magnify the ‘‘importance’’ and ‘‘unimportance’’ of criteria. To select the mining method, the hesitant fuzzy linguistic gained and dominance score method is developed. A case study concerning selecting a extraction method for a real mine in Yunnan province of China is presented to illustrate the applicability of the proposed method. The effectiveness of the proposed method is finally verified by comparing with other ranking methodses_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 71501135 and Grant 71771156es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship2019 Sichuan Planning Project of Social Science under Grant SC18A007es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship2018 Key Project of the Key Research Institute of Humanities and Social Sciences in Sichuan Province under Grant Xq18A01 and Grant LYC18-02es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipElectronic Commerce and Modern Logistics Research Center Program, Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Science, Sichuan Provincial Education Department, under Grant DSWL18-2es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipSpark Project of Innovation, Sichuan University, under Grant 2018hhs-43es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipScientific Research Foundation for Excellent Young Scholars, Sichuan University, under Grant 2016SCU04A23.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherIEEE Accesses_ES
dc.rightsAtribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es/*
dc.subjectUnderground mining method selectiones_ES
dc.subjectMultiple criteria decision making es_ES
dc.subjecthesitant fuzzy linguistic term setes_ES
dc.subjectscore functiones_ES
dc.subjectgained and lost dominance score methodes_ES
dc.subjectweight determinationes_ES
dc.titleUnderground Mining Method Selection With the Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Gained and Lost Dominance Score Methodes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2878784


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 3.0 España