Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDelgado López-Cózar, Emilio es_ES
dc.contributor.authorRuiz-Pérez, Sergioes_ES
dc.contributor.otherUniversidad de Granada. Departamento de Información y Comunicaciónes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2017-10-05T12:47:48Z
dc.date.available2017-10-05T12:47:48Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.date.submitted2017-07-24
dc.identifier.citationRuiz-Pérez, S. Drivers and Barriers for Open Access Publishing: From SOAP data 2010 to WOS data 2016. Granada: Universidad de Granada, 2017. [http://hdl.handle.net/10481/47637]es_ES
dc.identifier.isbn9788491633631
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10481/47637
dc.description.abstractIntroduction The Open Access (OA) movement was born in the early 2000s. With the creation of electronic journals and the serials crisis it has changed the scholarly communication system. There has been many attempts to understand which are the opinions, attitudes and practices of one of its main stakeholders: researchers. Objectives This PhD thesis is based on the largest survey to date. The SOAP survey was issued in 2010 and collected 38,522 responses from all disciplines and all over the world. We re-analysed the SOAP 2010 dataset and compared its results with a similar survey issued in 2016 which compiled 15,235 answers. Methods Descriptive longitudinal study of active researcher’s opinions on Open Access publishing. We re-analyzed a dataset from a previous study run in 2010 (SOAP 2010) and we contacted authors publishing in scientific journals indexed in international databases (WoS 2016). Results Most researchers are aware of the existence of OA journals in their fields and believe OA is beneficial. Around one third of researchers believe that OA articles have a citation advantage. Another third disagree and the remaining 33% are unsure. The majority of researchers don´t believe that OA articles have less quality than those in subscription-based journals, but a large proportion are unsure. More than half of researches have experience publishing in OA venues. More than half of those that published OA had to cover Article Processing Charges (APCs) to do so, although there are significant differences between disciplines and geographic regions. The most important factor for researchers when selecting a journal to publish in is the perceived quality of the journal. Speed of publication, absence of publication fees or the fact that the journal is OA are secondary. Conclusions OA is mature enough and all stakeholders involved in the scholarly communication system are pushing for it. Researchers have an interest in the system, but their priority is to publish in journals read by their peers. Quality and peer review are the most important features when it comes to publish, despite they are ideologically in favor of OA. Initiatives like SCOAP3 and OA2020 should mark the way forward.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipTesis Univ. Granada. Programa Oficial de Doctorado en Ciencias Socialeses_ES
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen_US
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherUniversidad de Granadaes_ES
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/en_US
dc.subjectInvestigación científica es_ES
dc.subjectInvestigadoreses_ES
dc.subjectAcceso abiertoes_ES
dc.subjectEdición científicaes_ES
dc.subjectContratos de edición es_ES
dc.subjectWeb of Science (WoS)es_ES
dc.subjectSOAP (Study of Open Access Publishing)es_ES
dc.titleDrivers and Barriers for Open Access Publishing: From SOAP data 2010 to WOS data 2016es_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesises_ES
dc.subject.udc621.39es_ES
dc.subject.udc659es_ES
dc.subject.udc3325es_ES
europeana.typeTEXTen_US
europeana.dataProviderUniversidad de Granada. España.es_ES
europeana.rightshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/en_US
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US


Files in this item

[PDF]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Tesis
    Tesis leídas en la Universidad de Granada

Show simple item record

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License