Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorBermejo Luque, Lilian 
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-03T08:49:02Z
dc.date.available2015-03-03T08:49:02Z
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.citationBermejo-Luque, L. Deduction without dogmas: the case of moral analogical argumentation. Informal Logic, 34(3): 311-336 (2014). [http://hdl.handle.net/10481/35051]es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0824-2577
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10481/35051
dc.description.abstractIn a recent paper, Fábio Perin Shecaira (2013) proposes a defence of Waller’s deductivist schema for moral analogical argumentation. This defence has several flaws, the most important of them being that many good analogical arguments would be deemed bad or deficient. Additionally, Shecaira misrepresents my alternative account as something in between deductivism and non-deductivism. This paper is both an attempt at solving this misunderstanding and an analysis and criticism of Waller and Shecaira’s forms of deductivism.es_ES
dc.description.abstractDans un article récent, Fábio Perin Shecaira (2013) défend l’approche déductiviste de Waller pour évaluer des arguments par analogie traitant de sujets moraux. Cette défense a plusieurs défauts, le plus important d'entre eux est que plusieurs bons arguments par analogie seraient jugés mauvais ou faibles. En outre, Shecaira dénature mon approche alternative en la décrivant comme quelque chose entre un déductivisme et un non déductivisme. Je tente à la fois de résoudre ce malentendu et d’offrir une analyse et une critique des formes de deductivisme de Waller et de Shecaira.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe work presented in this paper has been financed by a Ramón y Cajal Research Fellowship of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation and by the research projects FFI2011-23125 and FFI2011-24414 of the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherUniversity of Windsores_ES
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Licensees_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/es_ES
dc.subjectAnalogical argumentationes_ES
dc.subjectDeductivismes_ES
dc.subjectLinguistic normative modeles_ES
dc.subjectDefeasibilityes_ES
dc.titleDeduction without dogmas: the case of moral analogical argumentationes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

[PDF]

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 License